Contextual • Cyclical • Connected

Green Field

The Spaces of Learning

To Mimi Ito, I credit a change in my understanding of the spaces of learningFrom a rather narrow definition of learning as a predominantly school-based activity, I see now that we all are participants in a learning ecology more broadly. Home, school, work, community — each environment privileges different kinds of knowledge, identity, and behavior, but each is a space for learning. Learning is a process that we enact in every aspect of our lives, in all of our modes and identities.

Learning does not need to be so highly focused and directed as a problem-solving process, as I had envisioned in my earlier philosophy of learning. It can also arise in more informal environments through play and social engagement. The learning that happens in the home environment, in the peer environment, in the community has important implications for the learning that happens in school.

I envision the role of a teacher to be like that of a trainer in a gym. Formal educational environments take students’ learning in informal settings and push it, introducing new challenges, problems, and conflicts that turbo-charge the learning process. We move and exercise, to some degree, constantly in our daily lives. Carrying bags or walking to the grocery store are diffuse, everyday forms of exercise. Informal environments prioritize efficiency, utility, and perhaps pleasure in movement. However, if we’re really looking to give ourselves a workout, to effect meaningful change in our bodies and minds, we need to practice in an context that is primed for that purpose. The dedicated workout environment of the gym provides the necessary tools (weights and machines), guidance (a trainer), and a culture of others working towards the same broad goals.

The Cycles of Learning

To George Siemens, I owe a developing understanding of cyclical, networked learning that has the individual as its starting point. Learning that exists only in the head is incomplete. The unending process of learning reaches the close of one cycle when it is reified, externalized, and entered into the collective knowledge. From there, the artifact of understanding can take a new life, spark learning in others, or invite discussion that raises new ideas, that in turn create new dissonances, that spark new accommodations or adjustments, and so on. Even though I think that the doing is key, the true value of externalizing learning lies not in the artifact’s production value, but rather in the process of creating as an iterative, playful practice.

To Siemens, and to my classmate Heidi Martin, I owe an attention to learning as a process of making discriminations. We decide what information has enough merit to enter into our understanding. We make these judgements based on authority, evidence, logic, style, and emotion. In an environment with abundant access to knowledge, assessing worthiness is key.

Also to Siemens, I owe an understanding that “self-organization on a personal level is a micro-process of the larger self-organizing knowledge constructs created within corporate or institutional environments.” Just kidding – I’m still not entirely sure what that means…

Learning and Participation

From John Seely Brown, I have seen a powerful definition for learning: flexibly navigating in the flow that is the ever-moving river of experiences, information, and interactions that constitute life in the 21st century. Learning arises from an instance of cognitive conflict — an unsustainable dissonance between new information and existing understanding. Life presents us with these conflicts, and it is how we choose to resolve them that is a marker of learning. The teacher’s role, then, is to give students practice engaging with these important conflicts by offering information, ideas, and questions that spark cognitive dissonance and lead to student-driven inquiry.

Finally, to Brown I owe my newfound mantra as a teacher and learner:

“You gotta feel it with your body. You’ve got to be a part of that. You’ve got to be in it, not just above it and learning about it.”

 


Globe

For my learning philosophy video, I wanted to try my hand at one of the 21st century skills we discussed this semester: remixing. Using videos from the Prelinger Archives, a collection of over 60,000 films in the public domain on Archive.org, I hoped to remix some 20th century ideas into a new framework. This video shows a progression from top-down, behaviorist learning toward a more holistic, playful, and social model that I explored in my learning philosophy.  My goal was to show how our connected learning principles are not so different from what came before, but rather an evolution based on the new tools and technologies of our time: Remixing Education